From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47893858D28 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:28:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A47893858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org A47893858D28 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712597318; cv=none; b=c5QBbCC2sPnjbzKPymXONDxnboqZVEFqdnhnPu20XhKPO12gIdzeNGRbZd/YSGkCRnwvsIjxkYPOx0KwtmJgkc7keHfpV2Wkk+HLKAdHpc89olH5A4QtildtPaym3e3fyaGrJOa6KS7twRCi9FFdm/neMOaJcwGG/3Y0kTofiRo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712597318; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AqzVsMLO75vdusFL3COOtESfmVlfDZyLXQ042WQOVxw=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:From: To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=PmgCYf+dIvVwo8UwfrM7C+lp0GQPn4AZ8tHS7nUH+p2w1Qam/9THwR9vhTuMKYPFRMSg8H9NgOwjXK1+cQNjfNygZfHW3JgapKpjMNlVnCnY/ZC7lpfhn6yHAKF/w9OqPH3bRbqW4QTBnGSptvHDXkFzewLp5HX1UGguOfRGvN8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AA2922B46; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:28:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1712597315; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AqzVsMLO75vdusFL3COOtESfmVlfDZyLXQ042WQOVxw=; b=UPdT/sVVvU7JSDU4UQYOcqpi0qbl+EgFNcYKXTQFjYTx+dJBZgMidtqSiM+UInP/W75+37 dd0yd6vdplZqPiGw/qidTOHHkiK8QWEVmaUActy4t9LyA3xaJ1akm5FLWXs/lVAHcxo8FD o+xekECaCPtwnNqes9JPSnRjblF+FOA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1712597315; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AqzVsMLO75vdusFL3COOtESfmVlfDZyLXQ042WQOVxw=; b=xh5KJUI5YOn4go3g3eb7wcAoSi4vSZA2dgQ6kxkmiVMMZllUPSEhtfCpbp4FvTC0OITi6a LKwmP9fOo1i/smCA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1712597314; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AqzVsMLO75vdusFL3COOtESfmVlfDZyLXQ042WQOVxw=; b=SIztHmPWmUvPeHlsQqP4VQpOMeWaV2h0kyJCd+cpdB5VrqNuk+CzHeJySiaRWWOpeRQ9vt P820/rR6GWH6uIWGQfHGzFs9wkPqdiB7yPoei+fZEMrbwrA8USa3hw8HskzbsyZOyxuiy9 if2/dJ204iAxbQZIn1rPsrr0ANp9dnI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1712597314; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AqzVsMLO75vdusFL3COOtESfmVlfDZyLXQ042WQOVxw=; b=bjKzuXvlCyS61hl27Y3dxnbZPS0UAN0AGwQpUHFpJlyZGiA68gewazA8CjIf0QQn8GpEd8 hfRLbRiP+Hj3J4Aw== Received: from imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53EBD13A92; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id gx51FEIpFGZ8GAAAn2gu4w (envelope-from ); Mon, 08 Apr 2024 17:28:34 +0000 From: Martin Jambor To: Xi Ruoyao , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] ICF&SRA: Make ICF and SRA agree on padding In-Reply-To: <10eb4350f8ae3c49601f4da7135abd6cf6dd518e.camel@xry111.site> References: <10eb4350f8ae3c49601f4da7135abd6cf6dd518e.camel@xry111.site> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.38.2 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/29.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 19:28:34 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Level: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.53 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-2.23)[96.34%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns] X-Spam-Score: -3.53 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hello, On Sun, Apr 07 2024, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 23:19 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: >> The patch has been approved by Honza in Bugzilla. (I hope.=C2=A0 He did = write >> it looked reasonable.)=C2=A0 Together with the patch for PR 113907, it h= as >> passed bootstrap, LTO bootstrap and LTO profiledbootstrap and testing on >> x86_64-linux and bootstrap and LTO bootstrap on ppc64le-linux.=C2=A0 It = also >> passed normal bootstrap on aarch64-linux but there many testcases failed >> because the compiler timed out.=C2=A0 The machine is old and slow and mi= ght >> have been oversubscribed so my plan is to try again on gcc185 from >> cfarm.=C2=A0 If that goes well, I intend to commit the patch and then st= art >> working on backports. > > I've tried these two patches out on my own 24-core AArch64 machine.=20 > Bootstrapped (but no LTO or PGO) and regtested fine. > Thank you very much, I have pushed th patches to upstream. Martin