From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
To: fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] PR fortran/95979 - [10/11 Regression] ICE in get_kind, at fortran/simplify.c:129
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 20:44:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <trinity-57bb0f4c-4463-40d5-b1fb-568170ea0ddb-1602182694128@3c-app-gmx-bs59> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --]
Dear all,
the present PR turned out to be fixable rather easily, once Paul had the
idea to add another attempt of simplification of elemental intrinsics
for array-valued arguments. There was some fallout which required only
small adjustments, see commit message below.
Regtested cleanly on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for master / 10-branch?
Thanks,
Harald
PR fortran/95979 - ICE in get_kind, at fortran/simplify.c:129
Simplification of the elemental intrinsic INDEX with constant array-valued
arguments failed with an ICE or did not reduce to a constant array, depending
also on the presence of the optional KIND argument. Add a further attempt of
simplification in the case of elemental intrinsics, and make sure the KIND
argument is not removed prematurely during simplification of INDEX.
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/95979
* expr.c (gfc_check_init_expr): Fix check of return code from
gfc_intrinsic_func_interface.
* intrinsic.c (gfc_intrinsic_func_interface): Add further attempt
of simplification of elemental intrinsics with array arguments.
* iresolve.c (gfc_resolve_index_func): Keep optional KIND argument
for simplification of elemental use of INDEX.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/95979
* gfortran.dg/index_4.f90: New test.
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: pr95979.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2636 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
index b87ae3d72a1..32d905ad179 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/expr.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
@@ -2904,7 +2904,7 @@ gfc_check_init_expr (gfc_expr *e)
&& (e->value.function.isym->conversion == 1);
if (!conversion && (!gfc_is_intrinsic (sym, 0, e->where)
- || (m = gfc_intrinsic_func_interface (e, 0)) != MATCH_YES))
+ || (m = gfc_intrinsic_func_interface (e, 0)) == MATCH_NO))
{
gfc_error ("Function %qs in initialization expression at %L "
"must be an intrinsic function",
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
index ef33587a774..f4dfcf77e0b 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
@@ -5038,6 +5038,11 @@ got_specific:
if (!sym->module)
gfc_intrinsic_symbol (sym);
+ /* Have another stab at simplification since elemental intrinsics with array
+ actual arguments would be missed by the calls above to do_simplify. */
+ if (isym->elemental)
+ gfc_simplify_expr (expr, 1);
+
return MATCH_YES;
}
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/iresolve.c b/gcc/fortran/iresolve.c
index c2a4865f28f..994a9af4eb8 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/iresolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/iresolve.c
@@ -1296,11 +1296,7 @@ gfc_resolve_index_func (gfc_expr *f, gfc_actual_arglist *a)
f->ts.type = BT_INTEGER;
if (kind)
- {
- f->ts.kind = mpz_get_si ((kind)->value.integer);
- a_back->next = NULL;
- gfc_free_actual_arglist (a_kind);
- }
+ f->ts.kind = mpz_get_si ((kind)->value.integer);
else
f->ts.kind = gfc_default_integer_kind;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/index_4.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/index_4.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..09093784c8c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/index_4.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-options "-fdump-tree-original" }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "string_index" 0 "original" } }
+! PR fortran/95979
+
+program p
+ implicit none
+ integer, parameter :: i0 = index( 'abcd', 'b' , .true. , kind=4)
+ integer, parameter :: i1(*) = index(['abcd'], 'b' , .true. , kind=4)
+ integer, parameter :: i2(*) = index( 'abcd' ,['b'], .true. )
+ integer, parameter :: i3(*) = index( 'abcd' , 'b' ,[.true.] )
+ integer, parameter :: i4(*) = index(['abcd'],['b'],[.true.], kind=8)
+ if (size (i1) /= 1) stop 1
+ if (size (i2) /= 1) stop 2
+ if (size (i3) /= 1) stop 3
+ if (size (i4) /= 1) stop 4
+ if (i0 /= 2) stop 5
+ if (i1(1) /= 2 .or. i2(1) /= 2 .or. i3(1) /= 2 .or. i4(1) /= 2) stop 6
+end
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-08 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 18:44 Harald Anlauf [this message]
2020-10-15 18:14 ` *PING* " Harald Anlauf
2020-10-16 19:35 ` Thomas Koenig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=trinity-57bb0f4c-4463-40d5-b1fb-568170ea0ddb-1602182694128@3c-app-gmx-bs59 \
--to=anlauf@gmx.de \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).