* [PATCH, committed] Fortran: fix wrong array bounds check [PR113471]
@ 2024-01-19 20:32 Harald Anlauf
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Harald Anlauf @ 2024-01-19 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fortran, gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 277 bytes --]
Dear all,
I've pushed the attached obvious patch for a regression due to a
wrong array bounds check after regtesting on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
and verification of the fix by the reporter in the PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94b2e6cb1cc4feb122bf77f19a657c97bffa9b42
Thanks,
Harald
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: pr113471.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2318 bytes --]
From 94b2e6cb1cc4feb122bf77f19a657c97bffa9b42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 21:20:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: fix wrong array bounds check [PR113471]
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/113471
* trans-array.cc (array_bound_check_elemental): Array bounds check
shall apply here to elemental dimensions of an array section only.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/113471
* gfortran.dg/bounds_check_24.f90: New test.
---
gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_check_24.f90 | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_check_24.f90
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
index 26e7adaa03f..878a92aff18 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
@@ -3600,7 +3600,7 @@ array_bound_check_elemental (gfc_se * se, gfc_ss * ss, gfc_expr * expr)
continue;
}
- if (ref->type == REF_ARRAY && ref->u.ar.dimen > 0)
+ if (ref->type == REF_ARRAY && ref->u.ar.type == AR_SECTION)
{
ar = &ref->u.ar;
for (dim = 0; dim < ar->dimen; dim++)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_check_24.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_check_24.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d0251e8455b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_check_24.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! { dg-additional-options "-fcheck=bounds -fdump-tree-original" }
+!
+! PR fortran/113471 - wrong array bounds check
+
+program pr113471
+ implicit none
+ type t
+ integer, dimension(2) :: c1 = 0
+ end type t
+ type(t) :: cc(7), bb(7)
+ integer :: kk = 1
+
+ ! no bounds check (can be determined at compile time):
+ call foo (cc(7)% c1)
+
+ ! bounds check involving kk, but no "outside of expected range"
+ call foo (bb(kk)% c1)
+
+contains
+ subroutine foo (c)
+ integer, intent(in) :: c(:)
+ end
+end
+
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "below lower bound" 2 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "above upper bound" 2 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "outside of expected range" "original" } }
--
2.35.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-01-19 20:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-19 20:32 [PATCH, committed] Fortran: fix wrong array bounds check [PR113471] Harald Anlauf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).