From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
To: fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] PR fortran/102685 - ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 23:27:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <trinity-feb5b84d-1f05-42ed-a103-13450ad7ef55-1634246822349@3c-app-gmx-bs21> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1357 bytes --]
Dear Fortranners,
the attached patch adds a check for the shape of arrays in derived type
constructors. This brings it in line with other major brands.
Example:
type t
integer :: a(1)
end type
type(t), parameter :: y(2) = t([1,2])
end
This was silently accepted before, but now gives:
pr102685-z1.f90:4:33:
4 | type(t), parameter :: y(2) = t([1,2])
| 1
Error: The shape of component 'a' in the structure constructor at (1) differs from the shape of the declared component for dimension 1 (2/1)
During regtesting several previously invalid testcases surfaced
which would be rejected by the present change. They have been
adjusted along the discussion with Tobias and Paul, see the thread
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-October/056707.html
In developing the patch I encountered a difficulty with testcase
dec_structure_6.f90, which uses a DEC extension, namelist "old-style
CLIST initializers in STRUCTURE". I could not figure out how to
determine the shape of the initializer; it seemed to be always zero.
I've added code to accept this, but only under -fdec-structure, and
added a TODO in a comment. If somebody reading this could give me
a hint to solve end, I would adjust the patch accordingly.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK? Or further comments?
Thanks,
Harald
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: pr102685.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 5507 bytes --]
Fortran: validate shape of arrays in constructors against declarations
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/102685
* resolve.c (resolve_structure_cons): In a structure constructor,
compare shapes of array components against declared shape.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/102685
* gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_char_1.f90: Fix invalid code.
* gfortran.dg/pr70931.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_2.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/pr102685.f90: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
index 0d0af39d23f..d035b30ad7d 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
#include "data.h"
#include "target-memory.h" /* for gfc_simplify_transfer */
#include "constructor.h"
+#include "parse.h"
/* Types used in equivalence statements. */
@@ -1454,6 +1455,42 @@ resolve_structure_cons (gfc_expr *expr, int init)
}
}
+ /* Validate shape. We silently accept some cases where the apparent
+ shape of the constructor is zero, and we cannot check dynamic or PDT
+ arrays. */
+ if (cons->expr->expr_type == EXPR_ARRAY && rank == cons->expr->rank
+ && comp->as && !comp->attr.allocatable && !comp->attr.pointer
+ && !comp->attr.pdt_array)
+ {
+ mpz_t len;
+ mpz_init (len);
+ for (int n = 0; n < rank; n++)
+ {
+ gcc_assert (comp->as->upper[n]->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT
+ && comp->as->lower[n]->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT);
+ mpz_set_ui (len, 1);
+ mpz_add (len, len, comp->as->upper[n]->value.integer);
+ mpz_sub (len, len, comp->as->lower[n]->value.integer);
+ /* Shape agrees for this dimension. */
+ if (mpz_cmp (cons->expr->shape[n], len) == 0)
+ continue;
+ /* Accept DEC old-style initializers in STRUCTURE, where shape
+ is currently not correctly set (it is zero. Why?).
+ TODO: Fix this or find a better solution. */
+ if (flag_dec_structure
+ && mpz_cmp_si (cons->expr->shape[n], 0) == 0)
+ continue;
+ gfc_error ("The shape of component %qs in the structure "
+ "constructor at %L differs from the shape of the "
+ "declared component for dimension %d (%ld/%ld)",
+ comp->name, &cons->expr->where, n+1,
+ mpz_get_si (cons->expr->shape[n]),
+ mpz_get_si (len));
+ t = false;
+ }
+ mpz_clear (len);
+ }
+
if (!comp->attr.pointer || comp->attr.proc_pointer
|| cons->expr->expr_type == EXPR_NULL)
continue;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_char_1.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_char_1.f90
index 892a9c9f4c1..91fc4c902d8 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_char_1.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_char_1.f90
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
!
!
Type :: t5
- character (len=5) :: txt(4)
+ character (len=5) :: txt(2)
End Type t5
character (len=3), parameter :: str3(2) = [ "ABC", "ZYX" ]
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr102685.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr102685.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d325c27b32a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr102685.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR fortran/102685
+
+program p
+ type t
+ integer :: a(2)
+ end type
+ type(t), parameter :: x0 = t([2]) ! { dg-error "shape of component" }
+ type(t), parameter :: x1(2) = t([2]) ! { dg-error "shape of component" }
+ type(t), parameter :: x(2) = t([integer::]) ! { dg-error "shape of component" }
+
+ type u
+ integer :: a
+ integer :: b(0)
+ end type
+ type(u), parameter :: z0(2) = u(1, [integer::]) ! valid
+ type(u), parameter :: z1 = u(1, 2 ) ! valid
+ type(u), parameter :: z2(2) = u(1, 2 ) ! valid
+ type(u), parameter :: z3 = u(1, [2]) ! { dg-error "shape of component" }
+ type(u), parameter :: z4(2) = u(1, [2]) ! { dg-error "shape of component" }
+
+ type v
+ integer :: a(2,1)
+ end type
+ type(v), parameter :: y0 = v(reshape([1,2],[2,1])) ! valid
+ type(v), parameter :: y1 = v(reshape([1,2],[1,2])) ! { dg-error "shape of component" }
+ type(v), parameter :: y(1) = v(reshape([1,2],[1,2])) ! { dg-error "shape of component" }
+
+ print *, x0,x,x1,y0,y1,y,z0,z1,z2,z3,z4
+end
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr70931.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr70931.f90
index 08ecd687752..4444b5eec3b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr70931.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr70931.f90
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ program p
integer :: a
integer :: b(0)
end type
- type(t), parameter :: z = t(1, [2])
+! type(t), parameter :: z = t(1, [2]) ! original invalid code
+ type(t), parameter :: z = t(1, [integer::])
print *, z
end
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_2.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_2.f90
index e0f3f94c4ca..b428fa64b56 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_2.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_2.f90
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ contains
real(4) :: x(2)
end type mytype
- type (mytype), parameter :: dt1(2) = transfer (c1, mytype ((/1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0/)), 2)
+ type (mytype), parameter :: dt1(2) = transfer (c1, mytype ((/1.0,2.0/)), 2)
type (mytype) :: dt2(2)
dt2 = transfer (c2, dt2);
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-14 21:27 Harald Anlauf [this message]
2021-10-15 11:50 ` Tobias Burnus
2021-10-15 19:33 ` Harald Anlauf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=trinity-feb5b84d-1f05-42ed-a103-13450ad7ef55-1634246822349@3c-app-gmx-bs21 \
--to=anlauf@gmx.de \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).