From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 38267 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2018 21:10:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 38249 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jan 2018 21:10:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:10:49 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F1F780DB; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-124-118.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.124.118]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EB6C5C266; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w0TLAkKO020935; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:10:46 -0500 From: DJ Delorie To: "Sebastian Perta" Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RL78 new "vector" function attribute In-Reply-To: <000001d39901$6913f910$3b3beb30$@renesas.com> (sebastian.perta@renesas.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg02287.txt.bz2 If the RX and RL78 now share interrupt/vector semantics, can we combine the docs? I.e. instead of a new section for RL78, can we change the RX section to say something like "For RX and RL78..." ?