From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27678 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2011 12:23:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 27652 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Apr 2011 12:23:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:23:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505772D1; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:23:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id k-eW-XSxidFl; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:23:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B7A2D0; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:23:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ro@localhost) by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id p34CMuVM021442; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:22:56 +0200 (MEST) From: Rainer Orth To: Richard Guenther Cc: Sergey Ostanevich , Tom de Vries , Richard Earnshaw , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Mike Stump Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 1/9] ARM specific part. References: <4D94C603.7080505@codesourcery.com> <4D94C6FB.1080309@codesourcery.com> <4D95E523.1050800@codesourcery.com> <1301671135.4104.11.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4D95F802.80003@codesourcery.com> <4D97576C.9090306@codesourcery.com> <4D98A86A.6090905@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Richard Guenther's message of "Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:13:57 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 Richard Guenther writes: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Sergey Ostanevich wrote: >> I would recommend to use 'nm -S a.out' that gives >> >> [...] >> 00000000004004a4 0000000000000054 T main >> [...] >> >> then you can provide a name for the routine you want to test for the size. > > That also sounds reasonable. Is nm -S more portable than size? Neither Solaris nor IRIX nm have it. size isn't particularly portable, either: there are many variations in output format. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University