From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 798 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2011 09:23:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 775 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2011 09:23:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:23:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812E4817; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:23:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6TiYiK6guk3W; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:23:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B7E0816; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:23:26 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ro@localhost) by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id p2G9NPsJ012859; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:23:25 +0100 (MET) From: Rainer Orth To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Guenther Subject: Re: [build, lto] Only accept -fuse-linker-plugin if linker supports -plugin (PR lto/46944) References: Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Richard Guenther's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:42:29 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00889.txt.bz2 Richard Guenther writes: >> Ok for mainline if that passes, and perhaps also the 4.6 branch? > > I'm ok with this for mainline - Paolo, can you double-check the > autofoo stuff? As for 4.6 I'd like to give it a day or two on > trunk to allow people to report problems. Paolo, do you have any comments on the configure.ac part of the patch? Thanks. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University