From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.160.84]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77D8038582BC for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:31:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 77D8038582BC Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E5DA9C17; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:31:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KgvApE8gXN2O; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:31:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (p5085519d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.133.81.157]) (Authenticated sender: ro) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67DA8A9D89; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:31:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE; s=20200306; t=1665577884; bh=xD7CRelSCEh5AHiYRKGfSpcEMSQ2lf0dsGs+BfhLeC4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PbUfOuOETRbY8uhNSHkm2CEXqkBA1jGOoEFN/0CKrBFLklUcckqq9nyf7sp24BUN4 VsZ5PyUz6cuOWShUvK3IwbYAs4+NI6DoCJcegDu3LqrWn5oSlgYcwbruS9JcuflSP2 0iA2dEv1bsAULA/5QzR7tVSGbmlnCaOa7MztWZhQy+tRfBVu2Rgg4UKE7pf7apwUJ3 O4SIYYAd5MmO/YNm0+X76wofR95BkhIMGD+Q9tmWNK1OulR9pfPYBi59mELdB9da61 +TGz11rl9zEKMTLxeBSCXO8/wDVSb7SDoH7fNGpbn2bwZkIgb8SBcVjWzs0rGRHUPo jGvGNQfz27LaA== From: Rainer Orth To: Gaius Mulley via Gcc-patches Cc: Gaius Mulley Subject: Re: [PATCH] 0/19 modula-2 front end patches overview References: Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:31:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Gaius Mulley via Gcc-patches's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2022 16:31:18 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3788.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Gaius, > Testing > ======= [...] > The devel/modula-2 branch has been bootstrapped on: > [...] > sparc64 solaris > sparc32 solaris which versions exactly did you run those bootstraps on? I'm asking because for Solaris 11.4/SPARCV9 (sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11) was fine, while Solaris 11.4/SPARC (sparc-sun-solaris2.11) still runs into PR modula2/101392 (cc1gm2 -fdump-system-exports SEGV on Solaris/SPARC). For good measure, I also tried Solaris 11.3/SPARC (matching gcc211 in the cfarm), but that only revealed a couple of additional issues not seen on 11.4: modula2/107233 gm2 build hardcodes python3 modula2/107234 Format error in m2pp.cc (m2pp_integer_cst) modula2/107235 m2/boot-bin/mc leaks file descriptors before running into the same SEGV in the end. Just for the record, both Solaris 11.4/amd64 (amd64-pc-solaris2.11) and Solaris 11.4/i386 (i386-pc-solaris2.11) are fine. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University