From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29117 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2011 13:48:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 29107 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jul 2011 13:48:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:48:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8FF1A9E; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:48:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2pbaEaYXyjBm; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:48:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A407A9D; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:48:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ro@localhost) by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id p6DDmaRN007972; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:48:36 +0200 (MEST) From: Rainer Orth To: Jan Hubicka Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Ralf Wildenhues , Ian Lance Taylor Subject: Re: [build] Move libgcov support to toplevel libgcc References: <20110708185535.GI26368@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110708185535.GI26368@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> (Jan Hubicka's message of "Fri, 8 Jul 2011 20:55:35 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg01043.txt.bz2 Jan, > I would also preffer libgcov to go into its own toplevel directory, > especially because there are plans to add non-stdlib i/o into it i.e. > for kernel profiling. that way it would be handy to have libgcov > as a toplevel library with its own configure that allows it to be build > independently of rest of GCC. I'm probably not going to try that. There's so much cleanup possible in the toplevel libgcc move as is that will keep me busy for some time (provided that I can testing and approval for the parts I can't easily test myself ;-). Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University