From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 470 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2011 14:08:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 457 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2011 14:08:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:08:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5AF98F; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:08:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id udjK34F5lQ4l; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:08:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A946C98C; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:08:11 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ro@localhost) by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id p0OE8AlP007732; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:08:10 +0100 (MET) From: Rainer Orth To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Janis Johnson , Arnaud Charlet , Richard Guenther Subject: Unreviewed testsuite patches Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg01644.txt.bz2 Two larger testsuite patches of mine have remained unreviewed for some time: [ada, testsuite] gnat.dg cleanup http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00564.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01129.html While Arno is happy with the semantics of this one, he doesn't feel comfortable reviewing the DejaGnu parts of the patch. [testsuite, build] Convert boehm-gc testsuite to DejaGnu (PR boehm-gc/11412) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00244.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01128.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01638.html Again, the patch received some support, but no one feeled qualified to review it or even state if this could/should go into 4.6 or wait for 4.7. So both patches seem to need a global reviewer for lack of a testsuite maintainer. Thanks. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University