From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22458 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2015 11:53:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22340 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2015 11:53:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 11:53:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289B413C; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:53:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id y4dgPzioffnd; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:53:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F31B13A; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:53:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ro@localhost) by lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.15.2+Sun/8.15.2/Submit) id t81Brbav002033; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:53:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Rainer Orth To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [testsuite, fortran] XFAIL gfortran.dg/execute_command_line_2.f90 (PR libfortran/67412) Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 11:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-length: 597 As discussed in the PR, gfortran.dg/execute_command_line_2.f90 execution FAILs on Solaris 10 due to a bug in /bin/sh's exit code handling. Since the fix is involved and the issue a corner case, we decided to XFAIL execution instead (at least until an eventual fix is forthcoming). Tested with the appropriate runtest invocations on i386-pc-solaris2.10 and i386-pc-solaris2.12, installed on mainline as pre-approved in the PR. Rainer 2015-09-01 Rainer Orth PR libfortran/67412 * gfortran.dg/execute_command_line_2.f90: XFAIL execution on *-*-solaris2.10. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=sol10-execute_command_line_2-xfail.patch Content-length: 562 # HG changeset patch # Parent c91089a9a064d057d89d1b997b04e5cbac524137 XFAIL gfortran.dg/execute_command_line_2.f90 (PR libfortran/67412) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/execute_command_line_2.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/execute_command_line_2.f90 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/execute_command_line_2.f90 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/execute_command_line_2.f90 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ ! { dg-do run } +! { dg-xfail-run-if "PR libfortran/67412" { *-*-solaris2.10 } } ! ! Check that EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE handles invalid command lines appropriately ! --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-length: 143 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University --=-=-=--