From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3860 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2011 09:27:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 3849 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2011 09:27:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:26:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C69281; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:26:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4PSYTvbixbzp; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:26:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7880A280; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:26:52 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ro@localhost) by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id p2I9QjYq014070; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:26:45 +0100 (MET) From: Rainer Orth To: Richard Guenther Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [build, lto] Only accept -fuse-linker-plugin if linker supports -plugin (PR lto/46944) References: Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Richard Guenther's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:42:29 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg01076.txt.bz2 Richard Guenther writes: >> Ok for mainline if that passes, and perhaps also the 4.6 branch? > > I'm ok with this for mainline - Paolo, can you double-check the > autofoo stuff? As for 4.6 I'd like to give it a day or two on > trunk to allow people to report problems. The patch has been on mainline for two days now and I'm not aware of any problems. Unless someone objects, I'm going to apply it to 4.6 branch later today. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University