public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Gaius Mulley <gaius.mulley@southwales.ac.uk>
Cc: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, Modula-2 (C/C++/D/F/Go/Jit)] (Register spec fn) (v2)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yddimsaksv0.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87muhn5hmo.fsf@j228-gm.comp.glam.ac.uk> (Gaius Mulley's message	of "Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:53:35 +0100")

Hi Gaius,

> Many thanks for all the feedback/bugs/patches.
> I've been working through some of these.  The parallel build is now done.

thank you for the blazingly quick fixes.

>> * The mc output is far too verbose right now: this isn't of interest to
>>   anyone but gm2 developers ;-)
>
> added --quiet to all invocations of mc on master - will apply to 9.1.0
> soon.

Perfect.

>> With the missing gm2l worked around as above, my i386-pc-solaris2.11
>> testresults are way better now:
>>
>>                 === gm2 Summary for unix ===
>>
>> # of expected passes            11186
>> # of unexpected failures        24
>> # of unresolved testcases       12
>
> these results are great for solaris.  On the amd64/GNU/Linux I get 12
> failures (long.mod and long2.mod) run 6 times each.

Indeed: I'm pretty pleased by those results myself.

The remaining failures mostly fall in two categories:

Undefined			first referenced
 symbol  			    in file
KeyBoardLEDs_SwitchScroll           /var/gcc/gcc-10.0.0-20190708/11.5-gcc-gas-gm2-no-bootstrap-j1/i386-pc-solaris2.11/./libgm2/libcor/.libs/libcor.so
ld: fatal: symbol referencing errors
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gm2/coroutines/pim/run/pass/testiotransfer.mod compilation,  -g 
UNRESOLVED: gm2/coroutines/pim/run/pass/testiotransfer.mod execution,  -g  (link failed)

The definition lives in libgm2/libcor/KeyBoardLEDs.c and is Linux-only,
requiring the KGETLED/KSETLED ioctls.  An empty fallback implementation
is missing from the !linux section.

Then there's

/var/tmp//ccrqpjSdcpp:1:failed to find module name
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gm2/cpp/pass/cpph.mod,  -g  

FAIL: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod,  -g  

with no further indication in gm2.log what might be wrong.  Will have a
look.

Most 64-bit testcases FAIL for the same reason:

Undefined			first referenced
 symbol  			    in file
funcString                          /var/tmp//ccGNv4Zd.a(m.o)
ld: fatal: symbol referencing errors
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gm2/calling-c/datatypes/unbounded/run/pass/m.mod compilation,  -g 
UNRESOLVED: gm2/calling-c/datatypes/unbounded/run/pass/m.mod execution,  -g  (link failed)

funcString *is* defined in c.c, but that file is compiled in the .exp
file `under the hood' with exec ${XGCC} (not even visible in gm2.log)
and without the correct multilib flag.

[01m[K/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/solaris/gcc/testsuite/gm2/cpp/pass/subaddr.mod:32:3:[m[K [01;31m[Kerror: [m[Kcan only CAST objects of the same size
   32 | #else
      |   [01;31m[K^[m[K
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gm2/cpp/pass/subaddr.mod,  -g  

Haven't looked yet, but might be a generic multilib testing problem.

I also noticed that quite a number of temp files are left behind in
gcc/testsuite:

* many *_m2.s files.

* several .o files:

-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 8928 Jul  9 13:45 cpp.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 3772 Jul  9 13:46 cvararg.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 5248 Jul  9 13:52 except2.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 4616 Jul  9 13:52 except4.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 4480 Jul  9 13:52 except5.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 6152 Jul  9 13:52 except7.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 5408 Jul  9 13:52 except8.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 2888 Jul  9 13:56 exceptiontest.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 1968 Jul  9 13:55 fileio.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 1712 Jul  9 14:19 hello.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 6424 Jul  9 13:45 libexcept.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 9780 Jul  9 13:45 mycpp.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 3392 Jul  9 13:56 raise.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 3520 Jul  9 13:57 raise2.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 1760 Jul  9 14:17 rangesupport.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro gcc 3488 Jul  9 14:14 sys.o

* a few *.x[0-5] files:

except2
except4
except5
except7
except8
exceptiontest
libexcept
raise
raise2

* 3 others:

-rw-r--r--   1 ro       gcc         4199 Jul  9 14:00 integer_m2.cpp
-rw-r--r--   1 ro       gcc           36 Jul  9 14:14 results.dat
-rw-r--r--   1 ro       gcc           26 Jul  9 13:56 test.txt

Besides, gm2.log is very full with debug output, making it hard to see
what's going on:

Stuff like

looking for /var/gcc/gcc-10.0.0-20190708/11.5-gcc-gas-gm2-no-bootstrap-j1/i386-pc-solaris2.11/./libpim/.libs/libiso.a

even seems to run several times for the same lib!?

Same for

about to call target_compile with /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/solaris/gcc/testsuite/../gm2/examples/callingC/hello.mod /var/gcc/gcc-10.0.0-20190708/11.5-gcc-gas-gm2-no-bootstrap-j1/gcc/testsuite/hello.o object {additional_flags= -g  } {compiler=/var/gcc/gcc-10.0.0-20190708/11.5-gcc-gas-gm2-no-bootstrap-j1/gcc/xgm2 -B/var/gcc/gcc-10.0.0-20190708/11.5-gcc-gas-gm2-no-bootstrap-j1/gcc -I/var/gcc/gcc-10.0.0-20190708/11.5-gcc-gas-gm2-no-bootstrap-j1/i386-pc-solaris2.11/./libgm2/libpim:/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/solaris/gcc/testsuite/../gm2/gm2-libs -I/var/gcc/gcc-10.0.0-20190708/11.5-gcc-gas-gm2-no-bootstrap-j1/i386-pc-solaris2.11/./libgm2/libiso:/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/solaris/gcc/testsuite/../gm2/gm2-libs-iso -I/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/solaris/gcc/testsuite/../gm2/examples/callingC -fpim -L/var/gcc/gcc-10.0.0-20190708/11.5-gcc-gas-gm2-no-bootstrap-j1/i386-pc-solaris2.11/./libgm2/libpim/.libs -L/var/gcc/gcc-10.0.0-20190708/11.5-gcc-gas-gm2-no-bootstrap-j1/i386-pc-solaris2.11/./libgm2/libiso/.libs
 }

They are currently written with send_log, but should use verbose instead
so they are off by default, but can be enabled if need be by running
runtest with an appropriate number of -v options.

And finally the testsuite should live in gm2.dg.

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-10 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-14 13:10 Gaius Mulley
2019-06-29 10:15 ` Richard Sandiford
2019-06-29 12:52   ` Richard Biener
2019-06-29 20:29   ` Gaius Mulley
2019-06-29 18:08 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-02  0:18   ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-03  8:41 ` Rainer Orth
2019-07-08 15:20   ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-08 15:31     ` Rainer Orth
2019-07-09  9:25       ` Rainer Orth
2019-07-09 11:41         ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-10 11:50           ` Rainer Orth
2019-07-08 15:41     ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-08 21:21 ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-09  6:37   ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-09 19:50     ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-09 21:35       ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-10 17:56         ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-10 20:18           ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-10 20:38             ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-10 21:16               ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-09  9:56   ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-09 12:14     ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-09 13:24       ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-09 13:49         ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-09 16:23           ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-09 17:22             ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-09 12:31   ` Rainer Orth
2019-07-09 15:57     ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-09 17:32       ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-10 20:45         ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-10 12:11       ` Rainer Orth [this message]
2019-07-09 21:36   ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-10 17:11     ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-10 20:49       ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-11  7:57   ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-11 12:12     ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-11 16:40       ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-11 17:26         ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-12 15:41           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-12 18:35             ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-18 20:15   ` Matthias Klose
2019-11-20 10:10     ` Gaius Mulley
2019-07-19 14:22 ` Matthias Klose
2019-07-20 21:41 ` Matthias Klose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yddimsaksv0.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
    --to=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
    --cc=doko@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=gaius.mulley@southwales.ac.uk \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).