From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix libsanitizer build with -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 on 32bit architectures
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 21:29:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yddo7c8xmxt.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b56ef43a-4e02-4503-b775-ec67ddfea616@debian.org> (Matthias Klose's message of "Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:48:43 +0100")
Hi Matthias,
> libsanitizer fails to build with -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64,
> triggering an #error in /usr/include/features-time64.h
>
> --- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_procmaps_solaris.cpp
> +++ b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_procmaps_solaris.cpp
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>
> // Before Solaris 11.4, <procfs.h> doesn't work in a largefile
> environment.
> #undef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
> +#undef _TIME_BITS
> #include "sanitizer_platform.h"
> #if SANITIZER_SOLARIS
> # include <fcntl.h>
> --- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp
> +++ b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> // depends on _FILE_OFFSET_BITS setting.
> // To get this "true" dirent definition, we undefine _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
> below.
> #undef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
> +#undef _TIME_BITS
> #endif
>
> // Must go after undef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS.
>
>
> The patch to sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp is already present in
> trunk, but missing from the branches.
>
> Because all platform files are built in GCC, you also see the failure in
> sanitizer_procmaps_solaris.cpp. Just doing the same as for the posix
> files fixes the issue and libsanitizer builds again.
>
> Does this have any effect on the solaris builds? If not, ok for the trunk
> and the branches?
Since _TIME_BITS isn't used in Solaris system headers at all, there's no
impact.
However, the sanitizer_procmaps_solaris.cpp change needs to go into
upstream LLVM first and can only then be cherry-picked into libsanitizer
once it has been committed there.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 19:48 Matthias Klose
2024-02-22 20:29 ` Rainer Orth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yddo7c8xmxt.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
--to=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=doko@debian.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).