From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31316 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2011 09:46:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 31308 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2011 09:46:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:46:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823A65BF; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:46:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rS38EozZkpVG; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:46:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1893A5BE; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:46:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ro@localhost) by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id p569kYIg003024; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:46:34 +0200 (MEST) From: Rainer Orth To: Richard Guenther Cc: Jakub Jelinek , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only run pr48377.c testcase on i?86/x86_64 References: <20110603135911.GD17079@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Richard Guenther's message of "Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:32:13 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 Richard Guenther writes: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> Hi! >> >> This limits this testcase to i?86/x86_64 (moving to gcc.target/ would >> be harder because it relies on all the weirdo vectorization options to be >> passed), because apparently on strict alignment targets we don't handle >> aligned (1) non-aggregates correctly. =A0Or should it be instead xfailed >> just on selected strict-aligned targets? > > This has come up in the past, I think we should have an > strict-align target capability in our dejagnu harness (possibly > just white-listing all patterns we know). So we can > dg-skip this test for strict-align ones. Would you mind implementing > that? That list is quite long, though: there are currently 28 instances of #define STRICT_ALIGNMENT 1 in gcc/config, with a couple of others being variable. Wouldn't it be better to have a proper testcase instead? Rainer --=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University