From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21133 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2013 10:14:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 21118 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Mar 2013 10:14:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:14:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C953AD2; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:14:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Y5+PG1D3WuUO; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:14:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2981AD1; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:14:16 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ro@localhost) by lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5/Submit) id r2BAEFTC011163; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:14:15 +0100 (MET) From: Rainer Orth To: dominiq@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, iain@codesourcery.com, mikestump@comcast.net, davidxl@google.com Subject: Re: [testsuite] Remove dg-excess-errors in gcc.dg/inline_[34].c and unroll_[234].c References: <20130226103050.C52B93BE1D@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130226103050.C52B93BE1D@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> (Dominique Dhumieres's message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:30:50 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00398.txt.bz2 dominiq@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes: > The following tests XPASS on i?86-*-linux* and x86_64-*-linux* (see, > e.g., http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-02/msg02923.html ) > > XPASS: gcc.dg/inline_3.c (test for excess errors) > XPASS: gcc.dg/inline_4.c (test for excess errors) > XPASS: gcc.dg/unroll_2.c (test for excess errors) > XPASS: gcc.dg/unroll_3.c (test for excess errors) > XPASS: gcc.dg/unroll_4.c (test for excess errors) > > The following patch fixes this to remove the noise. In addition I do not > see why this tests should be restricted to i?86-*-linux* and > x86_64-*-linux* (the other tests inline_[12].c and unroll_[15] have no > restrictions). Tested on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10. > > Ok for mainline? If yes, could someone commit the patch since I don't have > write access? I've now tested the patch on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and i686-unknown-linux-gnu where it removes the XPASSes (thus less testsuite noise), and on {i386-pc,sparc-sun}-solaris2.{9,10,11} where the tests pass, too. Unless the release managers object, I plan to commit it later today. Thanks and sorry for the delay. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University