From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94318 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2017 13:35:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 94285 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jun 2017 13:35:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1136, sk:10walls, U*10walls, 10wallsgmailcom X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 3 recipients X-HELO: smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:35:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143BD7D4; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:35:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Hn87v859bYcK; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1F37D3; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:35:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ro@localhost) by lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.15.2+Sun/8.15.2/Submit) id v5KDZ9ni004984; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:35:09 +0200 (MEST) From: Rainer Orth To: JonY <10walls@gmail.com> Cc: Jonathan Wakely , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, Uros Bizjak , Mike Stump Subject: Re: [testsuite, i386] Always check for target i?86 and x86_64 References: <20170615113104.GP2958@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (JonY's message of "Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:25:07 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg01459.txt.bz2 JonY <10walls@gmail.com> writes: > On 06/20/2017 01:01 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: >> Given that there were no other comments, I've installed the patch. It >> would still be nice if the Cygwin/MingW maintainer could comment on the >> testcase situation for those targets. > > Honestly, I'm not sure how ms-bitfields work on non-Windows targets, I just noticed that it's handled in generic code in i386.c and the affected tests worked on the likes of Linux and Solaris ;-) > beyond that, the patch looks like it won't change the tests that run for > mingw/cygwin. True: as I mentioned in the submission https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01103.html I didn't touch the Cygwin/MingW patches listed there except for those where I could verify that they would/should work on any x86 target. Maybe you can have a look a the questions raised there ("There's one group of targets I've omitted completely"...)? Thanks. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University