From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
 [129.70.160.84])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67F6A3857C5E;
 Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:47:53 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 67F6A3857C5E
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56956CD87;
 Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:47:52 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
 with ESMTP id DgGs9xAk-6QA; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:47:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (p4fddb2f4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [79.221.178.244])
 by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9B01CE88;
 Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:47:51 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
 d=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE; s=20200306; t=1605527272;
 bh=GMmHSJEzrpZjh+XcL8m3an821gzlH4JXFAJc/zZbFPc=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=e+fY/w/tZ9FIj1sfe7RSi0oXrCDCnMWjnbUpQRtJi6CGRvIxVv5vRFq4BfVmLASdf
 80SjtYoNDXT/zlFVLQPcaO9bQ/zk0hImYkE8hLv3cE4cVVklehO5bAhG5o9cBDAjIr
 fzsgd5h1s3MSv7Vu5cFDUK9qy5AOjzFr/WGjyPFc/WqBkaoz58xpWJF/pahZp4YZTC
 +tFwaXJleqrTCjXvJrLpCGrojpklYRf8jfI3YYarHQneZm8mw3aMTfd8we8lAW+mrV
 3A2XxxzofA7K8lGd2t2wOpnxGPN7EN4KB6plbStK+Jjo576VrwlMXbvy4LJZ9SgPNI
 IoFc7FTmV48BQ==
From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
 Iain Sandoe <idsandoe@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix error shown during Solaris build
References: <20201113110735.GA505111@redhat.com>
 <yddima5y5a3.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
 <20201116103240.GS503596@redhat.com>
 <20201116103728.GT503596@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:47:50 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20201116103728.GT503596@redhat.com> (Jonathan Wakely's message
 of "Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:37:28 +0000")
Message-ID: <yddzh3hwmjd.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (usg-unix-v)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3790.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:47:54 -0000

Hi Jonathan,

>>I did try to use "-l ?[[:alnum:]]+" but Solaris sed only supports BREs
>>(as POSIX requires) and there doesn't seem to be an equivalent of the
>>GNU sed -E option to use EREs.
>
> POSIX agreed to add the -E option 8 years ago but that hasn't made it
> into the standard yet (because we're still on POSIX 2011+TC1+TC2 and
> presumably have to wait for the next revision).

and even so we still do support Solaris 11.3 from 2015 which certainly
won't get such a change.

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University