public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gback@cs.utah.edu To: java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: java/1123: optimization bug Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:08:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <19991206061149.30792.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> (raw) >Number: 1123 >Category: java >Synopsis: optimization bug with -fexpensive-optimizations >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: high >Responsible: apbianco >State: closed >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Wed Dec 20 12:06:17 PST 2000 >Closed-Date: Sun Mar 05 16:42:17 PST 2000 >Last-Modified: Sun Mar 5 21:00:00 PST 2000 >Originator: what is an originator again? What's being originated? The bug or the report? >Release: unknown-1.0 >Organization: >Environment: Linux/x86 current CVS >Description: Please refer to this mail http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/java-discuss/1999-q4/msg00452.html >How-To-Repeat: See URL above >Fix: I do not know >Release-Note: I am unable to reproduce this with the current compiler from cvs. Presumably this was a generic ia32 backend bug which has since been fixed. >Audit-Trail: Formerly PR gcj/116 From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz> To: gback@cs.utah.edu Cc: java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: gcj/116: optimization bug Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 19:52:40 +1300 FWIW, I can reproduce this in the current cvs gcc, but not in 2.95.2. regards [ bryce ] State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bryce State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 5 16:42:17 2000 State-Changed-Why: Not reproducable with current build (20000305) From: bryce@albatross.co.nz To: apbianco@cygnus.com, gback@cs.utah.edu, java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com Cc: Subject: Re: gcj/116 Date: 6 Mar 2000 00:42:17 -0000 Old Synopsis: optimization bug New Synopsis: optimization bug with -fexpensive-optimizations State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bryce State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 5 16:42:17 2000 State-Changed-Why: Not reproducable with current build (20000305) http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=116&database=java From: Godmar Back <gback@cs.utah.edu> To: bryce@albatross.co.nz Cc: apbianco@cygnus.com, gback@cs.utah.edu, java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: gcj/116 Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 21:55:16 -0700 (MST) I assume this was the bug with wrong sign extension code on the x86 for some boolean operations? Why don't you add this test (or an equivalent test) to the regression test suite? - Godmar > > Old Synopsis: optimization bug > New Synopsis: optimization bug with -fexpensive-optimizations > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: bryce > State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 5 16:42:17 2000 > State-Changed-Why: > Not reproducable with current build (20000305) > > http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=116&database=java > >Unformatted:
reply other threads:[~2000-12-20 12:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=19991206061149.30792.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com \ --to=gback@cs.utah.edu \ --cc=java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).