Re: preprocessor/1565 (fwd)

[Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr>]

The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/1565; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr>
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, kreckel@zino.physik.Uni-Mainz.DE,
        nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: preprocessor/1565 (fwd)
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 21:13:46 +0100 (CET)

 Neil Booth writes:
 
 > So you still fall under
 > 
 > "Furthermore, if any nested replacements encounter the name of the
 > macro being replaced, it is not replaced"
 
 The question is whether "nested replacements" means only those which
 are done without the rest of the source file's preprocessing tokens,
 or whether it on the contrary means all those which start with a macro
 token that results from the rescanning. It's not clear.
 
 Bruno
>From lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 2001
From: lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/2150
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010314113601.16317.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg02316.html
Content-length: 511

The following reply was made to PR c++/2150; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, treaves@silverfields.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2150
Date: 14 Mar 2001 11:27:12 -0000

 Synopsis: Internal compiler error.
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa
 State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 14 03:27:11 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Fixed in the CVS branch 3.0.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2150&database=gcc