c/179

c/179

[Joseph S. Myers]

The following reply was made to PR c/179; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: c/179
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:58:58 +0000 (GMT)

 I've entered a testcase for this bug as gcc.dg/uninit-B.c (XFAIL, as with
 many of the -Wuninitialized testcases).
 
 -- 
 Joseph S. Myers
 jsm28@cam.ac.uk
 
>From gdr@codesourcery.com Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 2001
From: gdr@codesourcery.com
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: c++/2204: G++ don't check (member) function parameter for abstract-ness.
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010307132426.3370.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg02070.html
Content-length: 740

>Number:         2204
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       G++ don't check (member) function parameter for abstract-ness.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          accepts-illegal
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Mar 07 05:26:00 PST 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Gabriel Dos Reis
>Release:        gcc-2.95.x and gcc-3_0-branch are affected.
>Organization:
>Environment:
Plateform independent.
>Description:
The program construct is ill-formed and should be
diagnosed as per 10.4/3. 

-- Gaby
>How-To-Repeat:
struct X {
  virtual void f() = 0;
  void g(X) { }
};
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: