From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/1920
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010226230601.14183.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg01766.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/1920; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: mdejong@redhat.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
        ebb9@email.byu.edu
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1920
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:02:39 -0800

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1920&database=gcc
 
 Eric's analysis is correct: this is not legal C++, and the bug is that
 neither gcc 2.95.2 nor CVS gcc issue any diagnostics.
 
 I've changed the status to "analyzed", "non-critical", "accepts-illegal"
 as Eric suggested.
 
 -- 
 The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable man
 persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all
 progress
 depends on the unreasonable man.         -----George Bernard Shaw