From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/1548
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00161.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>
Message-ID: <20010401000000.oRZifqfdzi7HYjK9Tkza7cNFk3N0xJDA7J01WDG2doc@z>

The following reply was made to PR c++/1548; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: nathan@jÂ:gn
>>From reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 2001
From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: rth@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/1762
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010214131601.27568.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg01255.html
Content-length: 393

The following reply was made to PR optimization/1762; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/1762
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:40:03 +0100

 I just tried gcc 2.97 20010205 and now I get the correct result, too.
 Hence the PR can be closed, I guess.
 
 Greetings,
 Volker Reichelt