public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/2563: g++ does not apply trivial conversions for operator overloading resolution
@ 2001-04-16 16:46 Ross Smith
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ross Smith @ 2001-04-16 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/2563; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ross Smith <ross.s@ihug.co.nz>
To: spacek@geocities.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/2563: g++ does not apply trivial conversions for operator
overloading resolution
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:45:38 +1200
spacek@geocities.com wrote:
>
> g++ does not seem to apply a conversion from an integer
> to a double when resolving operator overloading.
>
> The how-to-repeat section contains a very short program
> which fails to compile with error message
>
> test.cpp: In function `int main(int, char **)':
> test.cpp:18: no match for `Vector<double> & / int'
>
> However, an operator 'Vector<double> & / const double'
> is defined which should (I think) be enough.
Not a bug. See sections 14.8.3 and 14.8.2.1 of the C++ standard. Type
conversions are not considered when deducing argument types for function
templates; only exact matches are allowed, apart from cv-qualification
and a few other trivial conversions.
--
Ross Smith <ross.s@ihug.co.nz> The Internet Group, Auckland, New Zealand
========================================================================
"Hungarian notation is the tactical nuclear weapon of
source code obfuscation techniques." -- Roedy Green
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* c++/2563: g++ does not apply trivial conversions for operator overloading resolution
@ 2001-04-16 15:16 spacek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: spacek @ 2001-04-16 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats
>Number: 2563
>Category: c++
>Synopsis: g++ does not apply trivial conversions for operator overloading resolution
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: rejects-legal
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Mon Apr 16 15:16:01 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: spacek@geocities.com
>Release: gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (Debian release)
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
g++ does not seem to apply a conversion from an integer
to a double when resolving operator overloading.
The how-to-repeat section contains a very short program
which fails to compile with error message
test.cpp: In function `int main(int, char **)':
test.cpp:18: no match for `Vector<double> & / int'
However, an operator 'Vector<double> & / const double'
is defined which should (I think) be enough.
>How-To-Repeat:
Feed g++ the following short program. It will complain
about a / operator not defined, which I think is incorrect.
--- EXAMPLE START ---
template <class NT>
class Vector {
private:
NT data;
};
template <class NT> Vector<NT>
operator/ (const Vector<NT> &v, const NT n)
{
}
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
Vector<double> a, b;
b = a/2;
}
--- EXAMPLE END ---
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-04-16 16:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-16 16:46 c++/2563: g++ does not apply trivial conversions for operator overloading resolution Ross Smith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-16 15:16 spacek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).