public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rfg@monkeys.com
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: c/2678: gcc/g++ should stick compilation options into the .o file
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 13:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010428203649.2180.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> (raw)

>Number:         2678
>Category:       c
>Synopsis:       gcc/g++ should stick compilation options into the .o file
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Apr 28 13:46:01 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Ronald F. Guilmette
>Release:        gcc-2.95.2
>Organization:
>Environment:

>Description:
It would be Really Nice if the gcc and g++ compilers, when
compiling for some ELF target (at least) would stick a
copy of ALL of the compilation options used during the
compile into an ELF .comment or .note section within the
resulting .o file.

I wish I had a nickle for every time I had a .o file, left
over from some build I did a long long time ago (in a galaxy
not far away) and I was stuck saying to myself ``I wish I
knew what options this thing had been compiled with.  I wonder
if it was optimized.''

The ELF object file format provides a couple of obvious means
(.command and .note sections) for recording this exact infor-
mation into each .o file.  And I don't think that it would
be very hard to get the front-end gcc/g++ driver to pass
ALL compilation options down to cc1 and/or cc1plus.  They
in turn could easily still the options into a suitable ELF
section.

Note that this would also allow for some potentially inter-
esting types of retrospective automated analysis of .o files.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


             reply	other threads:[~2001-04-28 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-28 13:46 rfg [this message]
2001-04-29  4:16 Phil Edwards
2001-04-29  5:16 Phil Edwards
2001-04-29  5:46 Phil Edwards
2001-04-29 11:56 Ronald F. Guilmette
2001-04-29 20:06 Phil Edwards
2001-04-30  2:16 Ronald F. Guilmette
2001-04-30  2:36 Phil Edwards
2001-04-30  9:46 Ronald F. Guilmette
2001-04-30 10:26 Ronald F. Guilmette
2001-04-30 17:16 Phil Edwards
2001-04-30 17:36 Ronald F. Guilmette
2001-05-07 16:56 Phil Edwards
2002-11-05  7:46 Wolfgang Bangerth
2002-11-05  9:06 Phil Edwards
2002-11-05  9:08 bangerth
2002-11-05  9:16 Wolfgang Bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010428203649.2180.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --to=rfg@monkeys.com \
    --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).