From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Edwards To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/2678: gcc/g++ should stick compilation options into the .o file Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 05:46:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010429124601.32074.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-04/msg00720.html List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/2678; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Phil Edwards To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/2678: gcc/g++ should stick compilation options into the .o file Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 07:20:29 -0400 On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:26:53PM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On 29 Apr 2001, Phil Edwards wrote: > > I think that's .ident, not .comment. (Was ".command" a typo for ".comment"?) > > .ident assembler directives put data in .comment. Duh... this is what happens when I post without sleep. > Since the original message mentioned both .comment and .command, I think > .command did mean .comment. Pity, a .command section would've been useful for this. -- pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.