public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: objc/2713: Most objc tests fail on solaris2 w/missing threadfunctions
@ 2001-05-03 4:46 Rainer Orth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2001-05-03 4:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR objc/2713; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
Cc: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, ovidiu@cup.hp.com
Subject: Re: objc/2713: Most objc tests fail on solaris2 w/missing threadfunctions
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 13:41:24 +0200 (MEST)
Stan Shebs writes:
> The commented-out bit of code is essential for Darwin I'm pretty
> sure, so I didn't want to get rid of it until I understood why
> its absence seemed like a good idea.
true, but the other parts of the patch (detection of library for
sched_get_priority_{min, max} and setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to find libgcc_s
at test time are independent and shouldn't be problematic.
It had probably been best to submit them as three separate patches,
referencing each other as appropriate.
I had commented on the objc-act.c change, but don't know anything about PIC
code generation to really validate it.
Rainer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
Email: ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: objc/2713: Most objc tests fail on solaris2 w/missing threadfunctions
@ 2001-05-02 14:06 Stan Shebs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stan Shebs @ 2001-05-02 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR objc/2713; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
To: Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Cc: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, ovidiu@cup.hp.com
Subject: Re: objc/2713: Most objc tests fail on solaris2 w/missing
threadfunctions
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 14:04:11 -0700
Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> I've already posted a patch two months ago:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-03/msg00125.html
>
> and the relevant part has been ok'd
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-04/msg00074.html
>
> but never checked in.
The commented-out bit of code is essential for Darwin I'm pretty
sure, so I didn't want to get rid of it until I understood why
its absence seemed like a good idea.
Stan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-03 4:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-03 4:46 objc/2713: Most objc tests fail on solaris2 w/missing threadfunctions Rainer Orth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-02 14:06 Stan Shebs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).