Re: c/2584

Re: c/2584

[Andreas Jung]

The following reply was made to PR c/2584; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Andreas Jung" <andreas@digicool.com>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/2584
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 07:27:20 -0400

 If "this is by design" then this should be reflected in the documentation.
 The documentation still states that /usr/local/include will be searched in
 any case.
 When was this change introduced ? Until 2.95.2 all gcc version used
 /usr/local/include.
 Now compiling nearly every source code fails with 2.95.3 just because
 /usr/local/include has been removed for some reasons. Please explain this
 design descision.
 
 Thanks,
 Andreas
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: <mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org>
 To: <andreas@andreas-jung.com>; <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>;
 <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>
 Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 12:49 AM
 Subject: Re: c/2584
 
 
 > Synopsis: gcc omits /usr/local/include
 >
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 > State-Changed-By: mmitchel
 > State-Changed-When: Thu May  3 21:49:53 2001
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     Not a bug; this is by design.
 >
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2584&database=gcc
 
 

Re: c/2584

[mmitchel]

The following reply was made to PR c/2584; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org
To: andreas@andreas-jung.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/2584
Date: 4 May 2001 04:49:55 -0000

 Synopsis: gcc omits /usr/local/include
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 State-Changed-By: mmitchel
 State-Changed-When: Thu May  3 21:49:53 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Not a bug; this is by design.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2584&database=gcc