From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pme@gcc.gnu.org
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/2736
Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 23:56:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010507065601.3690.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00175.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/2736; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: pme@gcc.gnu.org
To: derrick@caltech.edu, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2736
Date: 7 May 2001 06:55:51 -0000

 Synopsis: g++ misinterpreting initializer syntax
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 State-Changed-By: pme
 State-Changed-When: Sun May  6 23:55:50 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     
     Closed on request of submitter.  It turns out there was a
     missing namespace qualifier in the problematic statement;
     "y2(Range(l,u))" should have read "y2(blitz::Range(l,u))".
     
     We agreed that it was a bug in user code, but with an
     unhelpful diagnostic message.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2736&database=gcc