Re: preprocessor/2677

Re: preprocessor/2677

[Ronald F. Guilmette]

The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/2677; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
To: neil@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: preprocessor/2677 
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 10:09:47 -0700

 In message <20010507160641.4731.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>, you wrote:
 
 >Synopsis: Need something to #ifdef on when -pedantic/-pedantic-errors
 >
 >State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 >State-Changed-By: neil
 >State-Changed-When: Mon May  7 09:06:41 2001
 >State-Changed-Why:
 >    We've decided that implementing this is not a good idea.
 
 We who?
 
 >    In general, we want it to be the case that the compiler's
 >    output is not affected by warning switches...
 
 -pedantic-errors is _not_ a ``warning switch''.
 
 
 Please re-open the bug.
 

Re: preprocessor/2677

[neil]

The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/2677; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: neil@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  rfg@monkeys.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: preprocessor/2677
Date: 7 May 2001 16:06:41 -0000

 Synopsis: Need something to #ifdef on when -pedantic/-pedantic-errors
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 State-Changed-By: neil
 State-Changed-When: Mon May  7 09:06:41 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     We've decided that implementing this is not a good idea.
     In general, we want it to be the case that the compiler's
     output is not affected by warning switches, and predefining
     a macro based on them allows people to do that.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2677&database=gcc