public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/2253
@ 2001-05-20 9:36 nathan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: nathan @ 2001-05-20 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/2253; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
To: Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/2253
Date: 20 May 2001 16:26:36 -0000
Synopsis: gcc-3.0 cannot compile mysql
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: nathan
State-Changed-When: Sun May 20 09:26:36 2001
State-Changed-Why:
request info on whether it is a 2.95 regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2253&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/2253
@ 2001-05-20 10:06 Franz Sirl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Franz Sirl @ 2001-05-20 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/2253; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>,
gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/2253
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 18:59:47 +0200
On Sunday 20 May 2001 18:27, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2253&database=gcc
>
> Franz, can you confirm/deny whether this is a regression from 2.95?
Hmm, it seems it _was_ a regression from gcc-2.95.3, I couldn't reproduce it
today (didn't try for a while), so I guess it has been fixed somewhere along
the way at least for PPC.
Franz.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/2253
@ 2001-05-20 9:56 Nathan Sidwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Sidwell @ 2001-05-20 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/2253; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/2253
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 17:51:43 +0100
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2253&database=gcc
taking a 20010520 3.0 CVS snapshot and building a powerpc-linux-gnu targeted
cross compiler running on i686-pc-linux-gnu, I can compile without a problem
nathan@uha:87>./cc1plus -O2 -quiet incomming/2253.ii
please confirm/deny whether the problem is resolved.
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/2253
@ 2001-05-20 9:36 Nathan Sidwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Sidwell @ 2001-05-20 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/2253; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/2253
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 17:27:52 +0100
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2253&database=gcc
Franz, can you confirm/deny whether this is a regression from 2.95?
thanks,
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-20 10:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-20 9:36 c++/2253 nathan
2001-05-20 9:36 c++/2253 Nathan Sidwell
2001-05-20 9:56 c++/2253 Nathan Sidwell
2001-05-20 10:06 c++/2253 Franz Sirl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).