Re: c++/2253

Re: c++/2253

[Nathan Sidwell]

The following reply was made to PR c++/2253; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
        Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2253
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 17:51:43 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2253&database=gcc
 taking a 20010520 3.0 CVS snapshot and building a powerpc-linux-gnu targeted
 cross compiler running on i686-pc-linux-gnu, I can compile without a problem
 
 nathan@uha:87>./cc1plus -O2 -quiet incomming/2253.ii 
 
 please confirm/deny whether the problem is resolved.
 
 nathan
 -- 
 Dr Nathan Sidwell   ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::   CodeSourcery LLC
          'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
 nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org

Re: c++/2253

[Franz Sirl]

The following reply was made to PR c++/2253; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>,
 gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
 nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2253
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 18:59:47 +0200

 On Sunday 20 May 2001 18:27, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2253&database=gcc
 >
 > Franz, can you confirm/deny whether this is a regression from 2.95?
 
 Hmm, it seems it _was_ a regression from gcc-2.95.3, I couldn't reproduce it 
 today (didn't try for a while), so I guess it has been fixed somewhere along 
 the way at least for PPC.
 
 Franz.

Re: c++/2253

[Nathan Sidwell]

The following reply was made to PR c++/2253; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
        Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2253
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 17:27:52 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2253&database=gcc
 
 Franz, can you confirm/deny whether this is a regression from 2.95?
 
 thanks,
 nathan
 -- 
 Dr Nathan Sidwell   ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::   CodeSourcery LLC
          'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
 nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org

Re: c++/2253

[nathan]

The following reply was made to PR c++/2253; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
To: Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2253
Date: 20 May 2001 16:26:36 -0000

 Synopsis: gcc-3.0 cannot compile mysql
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 State-Changed-By: nathan
 State-Changed-When: Sun May 20 09:26:36 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     request info on whether it is a 2.95 regression
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2253&database=gcc