From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/2894: Incorrect union padding on Linux/ARM port; otherarchitectures correct
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 00:26:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010522072601.4924.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00618.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/2894; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,  <jeffm@suse.com>
Subject: Re: c/2894: Incorrect union padding on Linux/ARM port; other
 architectures correct
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 08:23:04 +0100 (BST)

 On 22 May 2001, Neil Booth wrote:
 
 >  The above 2 lines make it clear that this is not really a "c" category
 >  bug, but a target bug.  In future, please be more precise with the
 >  categorisation - it does save time.
 
 However, since 2547 was mentioned as related, and 2820 also seems somewhat
 similar, and both of those are on x86, is it so obvious that this *is* a
 target bug?
 
 -- 
 Joseph S. Myers
 jsm28@cam.ac.uk