public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rod Stewart <stewart@lab43.org>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/2878: ARM: cannot use 3.0 to build stage 1 of bootstrap;bad code generated at -O0?
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010523180600.29343.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> (raw)
The following reply was made to PR target/2878; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Rod Stewart <stewart@lab43.org>
To: <philb@gnu.org>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: target/2878: ARM: cannot use 3.0 to build stage 1 of bootstrap;
bad code generated at -O0?
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 13:56:44 -0400 (EDT)
On 20 May 2001 philb@gnu.org wrote:
> >Synopsis: ARM: cannot use 3.0 to build stage 1 of bootstrap; bad
> code generated at -O0?
> >Description:
> Bootstrapping the 3.0 branch on arm-linux, using a compiler previously
> built from the same sources to build stage 1, eventually fails here:
Phil,
Are you certain this is still a problem? I'm currently using gcc version
3.0 20010522 to build itself. It is now using the stage2 compiler. This
is with the following tools:
gcc-ss-3.0-0_20010523
binutils-2.10.1-1_nw2
glibc-2.1.3-22_nw3
I did install the new gcc in /usr/local/bin, with that directory in my
path first. I guess it could have gotten confused and used my 2.95
compiler in /usr/bin. (I'll do another build once this one finishes with
2.95 removed from the machine).
Any ideas on how I can reproduce this?
Thanks,
-Rms
next reply other threads:[~2001-05-23 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-23 11:06 Rod Stewart [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-13 10:27 target/2878: ARM: cannot use 3.0 to build stage 1 of bootstrap; bad " mmitchel
2001-06-12 3:34 rearnsha
2001-06-08 6:09 nathan
2001-05-26 16:36 Philip Blundell
2001-05-23 15:36 Philip Blundell
2001-05-23 14:16 target/2878: ARM: cannot use 3.0 to build stage 1 of bootstrap;bad " Rod Stewart
2001-05-23 11:36 target/2878: ARM: cannot use 3.0 to build stage 1 of bootstrap; bad " Philip Blundell
2001-05-20 3:36 philb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010523180600.29343.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--to=stewart@lab43.org \
--cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).