From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: neil@gcc.gnu.org
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: preprocessor/2948
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 01:16:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010526081602.13156.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00845.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/2948; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: neil@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, sean@mcneil.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: preprocessor/2948
Date: 26 May 2001 08:11:04 -0000

 Synopsis: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -E output
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 State-Changed-By: neil
 State-Changed-When: Sat May 26 01:11:04 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Please confirm the *3 exact* command lines you use.  I suspect
     they are subtly different in their effects.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2948&database=gcc