From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/40
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 18:46:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010529014601.13671.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00983.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/40; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
To: chrisb@sandy.force9.co.uk, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, 43170@bugs.debian.org,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/40
Date: 29 May 2001 01:44:40 -0000

 Synopsis: Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class
 
 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
 State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 State-Changed-When: Mon May 28 18:44:40 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Tested under gcc version 3.0 20010528 (prerelease)  
     
     Your example uses the GCC named return value extension which i
     which is deprecated. Compiling your example yielded error
     messages like:
     a.cc: In member function `std::string foo::do_foo(const std::string&)':
     a.cc:15: warning: the named return value extension is deprecated, please see
        the documentation for details
     
     
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=40&database=gcc