From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/2014 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 00:56:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010529075601.8022.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00995.html List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/2014; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Cc: , Subject: Re: c++/2014 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 08:54:06 +0100 (BST) On 29 May 2001 rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Subject: Re: c++/2014 > Date: 29 May 2001 01:32:14 -0000 > > Synopsis: error in print_rtl_and_abort, at flow.c:6592 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: rodrigc > State-Changed-When: Mon May 28 18:32:14 2001 > State-Changed-Why: > Don't bootstrap with -O7 Why exactly is an ICE not a bug, just because it requires -O7 to show up? If -O7 was used with the already installed compiler to bootstrap, that might be a problem - but providing the installed compiler builds the stage1 compiler without optimisation, the subsequent bootstrap stages should work fine with -O7, and there's a compiler bug present if they don't. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk