From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Edwards To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/3016: stl_queue.h bugs wrt compliance Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 15:16:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010531221606.3477.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg01068.html List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3016; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Phil Edwards To: brendan@zen.org Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/3016: stl_queue.h bugs wrt compliance Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:49:10 -0400 On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:50:54PM -0000, brendan@zen.org wrote: > *************** protected: > *** 76,81 **** > _Sequence c; > public: > ! queue() : c() {} > ! explicit queue(const _Sequence& __c) : c(__c) {} > > bool empty() const { return c.empty(); } > --- 76,80 ---- > _Sequence c; > public: > ! explicit queue(const _Sequence& __c = _Sequence()) : c(__c) {} > > bool empty() const { return c.empty(); } I disagree with removing the copy ctor. Just because it isn't mandated doesn't mean it isn't allowed. What if I wished to construct a vector-of-queue-of-T? Queue wouldn't meet the copy-constructible requirement. Phil -- pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.