Re: libstdc++/3036: pair constructor not updated per DR 265

[Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>]

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3036; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
To: kenny.simpson@gs.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, theonetruekenny@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3036: pair constructor not updated per DR 265
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 20:04:02 -0400

 On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 01:04:16AM -0000, kenny.simpson@gs.com wrote:
 > The constructor for pair has been changed, see:
 > http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#265
 
 The notes on that DR mention that "this is the right thing to do now that
 core issue 178 has cleared it up."  Does gcc DTRT as far as 178 goes?
 It seems to be introducing the "value-initialized" thing, and I'd hate to
 introduce a fix in the library which depends on a change in the compiler
 which hasn't happened yet.
 
 Maybe gcc has been behaving correctly already, and they're just fixing up
 the wording in the standard text.  In which case my question is utterly moot.
 
 -- 
 pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
 devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
 The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.