From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jsm28@gcc.gnu.org
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/2804
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 15:36:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010604223600.2781.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00102.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/2804; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: jsm28@gcc.gnu.org
To: etienne.lorrain@masroudeau.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/2804
Date: 4 Jun 2001 22:29:24 -0000

 Old Synopsis: regression from 2.95.3
 New Synopsis: [*not*] regression from 2.95.3
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 State-Changed-By: jsm28
 State-Changed-When: Mon Jun  4 15:29:24 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     ICE confirmed with 3.0 CVS.  2.95.3 also gets an ICE on
     this code for me, so this is not a regression.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2804&database=gcc