Re: libstdc++/3026

[Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>]

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3026; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
To: cate@dplanet.ch
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>, pme@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3026
Date: 07 Jun 2001 14:44:41 +0200

 Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@math.ethz.ch> writes:
 
 | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
 | > 
 | > Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@math.ethz.ch> writes:
 | > | 
 | > |  Ok, but there is also the main problem:
 | > |  why not to change also ::acosl into std::acosl (and this change
 | > |  for few other math functions) ?
 | > 
 | > Ideally we should be doing something to that effect.  But the details
 | > and issues aren't tht crystal clear -- trust me, we're working on
 | > fixes.
 | > 
 | > -- Gaby
 | 
 | An other problem: Should '#include <complex>' define functions/classes
 | in std namespace, without exporting it in global namespace?
 | Now <complex> and <complex.h> are the same, and both use global
 | namespace.
 
 There is nothing named <complex.h> specified by C++.  The standard
 header <complex> defines its entities only in namespace std.  I
 strongly suggest you stick to those standard interfaces.
 
 -- Gaby
 CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com