From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Simpson, Kenny" <Kenny.Simpson@gs.com>
To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3113
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:26:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010611192605.19009.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00425.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3113; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Simpson, Kenny" <Kenny.Simpson@gs.com>
To: "'bkoz@gcc.gnu.org'" <bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"'kenny.simpson@gs.com'" <Kenny.Simpson@gs.com>,
	"'theonetruekenny@yahoo.com'" <theonetruekenny@yahoo.com>,
	"'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3113
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:17:00 -0400

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=3113&database=gcc
 
 Darn, Benjamin fixed it before I could send off my nice pretty report, but I
 may have found something else.
 The first version should not have compiled without a return type.
 The online compiler spits out an error for this case.
 "9: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `operator()' with no type"
 Does 3.1 not?
 Should I file a separate bug report?
 
 -Kenny