From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Mitchell To: pme@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/2071 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 02:06:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010612090603.25488.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00470.html List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/2071; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Mitchell To: "rittle@labs.mot.com" , "bkoz@redhat.com" Cc: "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" , "pedwards@disaster.jaj.com" Subject: Re: libstdc++/2071 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 02:04:48 -0700 --On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 03:53:38 AM -0500 Loren James Rittle wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > (CC'd Mark so he knows what is going on as release manager. If you > don't have time to read the background, then feel free to jump to [MARK].) I think that we must fix this bug, and I think your approach is a good one. Thank you for taking the time to explain it in detail. If Benjamin does not reply, you may apply this patch at 3:00 PM on June 12th, GMT - 8. That will give Benjamin a chance to shout if he sees something wrong with it. You do need to add porting.texi information about the new _GLIBCPP_AVOID_FSEEK macro so that people know what it's for. You are doing an excellent job nailing lose ends. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com