From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Zack Weinberg" To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: preprocessor/3243: /usr/local/gcc-3.0/include/g++-v3/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/gthr.h:98:26: gthr-default.h: No such file or directory Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:16:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010620011602.3502.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00804.html List-Id: The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/3243; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Zack Weinberg" To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, carlo@alinoe.com Cc: Subject: Re: preprocessor/3243: /usr/local/gcc-3.0/include/g++-v3/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/gthr.h:98:26: gthr-default.h: No such file or directory Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:13:47 -0700 To clarify what Neil said: -I- has had the documented effect of separating "" and <> search paths, *and* inhibiting the search of the 'directory of the current file', since at least 2.7.2. -I- can indeed break system headers that expect the 'directory of the current file' to be searched. That may not be a good enough reason to change a feature with that length of tenure. I am all for separating the two effects, if we can agree on the interface and the degree of backward compatibility. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=3243&database=gcc -- zw Well, there's another triumph for clean hands, a pure heart, a good soul...and vastly superior technology. -- _Undocumented Features: Out in the Cold_