From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Barto To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: bootstrap/3263: g++ 3.0 fails in 64 bit mode Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:16:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010620141602.16824.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00826.html List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3263; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Barto To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: bootstrap/3263: g++ 3.0 fails in 64 bit mode Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:09:39 -0700 Note that the compile flag that is missing (and critical) is -fPIC -barto In message <20010619173603.29371.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>you write: >Thank you very much for your problem report. >It has the internal identification `bootstrap/3263'. >The individual assigned to look at your >report is: unassigned. > >>Category: bootstrap >>Responsible: unassigned >>Synopsis: g++ 3.0 fails in 64 bit mode >>Arrival-Date: Tue Jun 19 10:36:03 PDT 2001 -- David Barto barto@ucsd.edu barto@visionpro.com From a Marketing type: Don't give me any technical reason why something can't be done. If you really believed in the product you'd make it work.