From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/3286: --program-suffix is ignored Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:46:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010620184601.30058.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00845.html List-Id: The following reply was made to PR other/3286; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Cc: , Subject: Re: other/3286: --program-suffix is ignored Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:41:13 +0100 (BST) On 20 Jun 2001 fmuel@mpi-halle.mpg.de wrote: > Most executables are installed without the suffix given to > configure. > >How-To-Repeat: > ../gcc-3.0/configure --program-suffix='-3.0' && make && make install Why did you think that --program-suffix is supported? The supported configure options are listed in gcc/doc/install.texi (and the generated HTML documentation in the INSTALL directory in releases); --program-suffix is deliberately (i.e., when adding standard configure options such as --bindir to the GCC documentation, I deliberately did not add --program-suffix) not listed there. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk