From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Sammartino, Ryan" <rsammartino@ea.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: other/3286
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:46:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010621004600.5165.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00869.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR other/3286; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Sammartino, Ryan" <rsammartino@ea.com>
To: "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "'fmuel@mpi-halle.mpg.de'"
	 <fmuel@mpi-halle.mpg.de>,
   "'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'"
	 <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "'nobody@gcc.gnu.org'" <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: other/3286
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:45:03 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%26pr=3286%26database=gcc
 
 > Why did you think that --program-suffix is supported? 
 
 Probably because it is listed in the output of configure --help
 
 Anyways, it would be nice if --program-suffix and --program-prefix
 were supported... makes it nicer for those of us who have multiple
 versions of various cross-compilers on one system.
 
 Ryan T. Sammartino
 I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development That'
 to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb.  Thank you.
 Vance Petree