From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, kunert@physik.tu-dresden.de, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/3476: wrong `const' behaviour
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 06:39:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010629133919.9416.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg01178.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: wrong `const' behaviour

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: nathan
State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 29 06:39:19 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    Not a bug. a const object must have an initializer [8.5]/9
    Yeay even though it has no members. You need an '= {}'.
    I think there might be a defect report about that.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=3476&database=gcc