From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru>
To: rth@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/3037
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 06:16:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010630131600.5480.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg01200.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/3037; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru>
To: rth@redhat.com
Cc: rearnsha@arm.com,  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	  denisc@overta.ru,  gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/3037
Date: 30 Jun 2001 17:00:20 +0400

 rth@redhat.com writes:
 
 > > Try: -mcpu=strongarm -O2
 > 
 > Still doesn't segfault the compiler on me.
 > 
 
 Excuse my long delay. I was out of home.
 
 At the moment of posting bug report GCC crashes in ".ce2" pass because
 life info before ".ce2" pass and after it was different.
 Life info was different because life info before ".ce2" was wrong (as
  described in my bug report).
 
 IMHO: you can't reproduce this problem because something changes in
 ".ce2" pass.
 
 Denis.