public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: enrico.scholz@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: bootstrap/3653: -fmessage-length=72 with g++ makes no sense
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010711215051.10709.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> (raw)

>Number:         3653
>Category:       bootstrap
>Synopsis:       -fmessage-length=72 with g++ makes no sense
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Jul 11 14:56:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
>Release:        gcc version 3.0.1 20010710
>Organization:
>Environment:

>Description:
By default, g++ assumes -fmessage-length=72. I think this is not a good
idea because:

0. Former g++ versions do not do it. Therefore there should be a good reason for the change.

1. It breaks existing tools. E.g. Emacs awaits a "<location>:<line>
<error-msg>" format and gets confused by the current behavior

2. It makes error-messages completely unreadable. E.g. if there are
messages saying something about templates, it is not unusual that the
template-parameter-list is splitted over several lines.

3. The value of 72 is IMHO obsoleted. Are there still existing C++
programmers  which are writing code on an 80-column console? I think most ones are using xterms or framebuffer-screens with 100 or more columns.

4. Only the g++ frontend defaults to this linebreak. This is inconsequentlally.

>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


             reply	other threads:[~2001-07-11 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-11 14:56 enrico.scholz [this message]
2001-07-12  1:46 Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-12  4:06 Enrico Scholz
2001-07-12  5:06 Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-12 12:56 Phil Edwards
2001-07-13 13:26 Enrico Scholz
2001-07-13 13:36 Phil Edwards
2001-07-13 13:46 Enrico Scholz
2001-07-13 13:56 Enrico Scholz
2001-07-13 17:36 Enrico Scholz
2001-07-13 20:36 Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-16 17:06 Enrico Scholz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010711215051.10709.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --to=enrico.scholz@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
    --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).